header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 159, Issue 7373

11 June 2009
IN THIS ISSUE

M (a minor by his litigation friend LT) v Ministry of Justice [2009] EWCA Civ 419, [2009] All ER (D) 44 (Jun)

Napier and another v Pressdram Ltd [2009] EWCA Civ 443, [2009] All ER (D) 31 (Jun)

Roger Smith stands up for transparency

Jane Mayfield reviews the FSA’s tougher stance

Personal injury

Ian Barratt explains why employee wellbeing is rising up the work agenda

Kenneth Warner weighs up evidence for causal links in cases of injury

When is media attendance in court intrusive? asks Rebecca Newitt

When is it reasonable to make a possession order? asks James Driscoll

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll