header-logo header-logo

11 June 2009 / James Driscoll
Issue: 7373 / Categories: Features , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Nothing going on but the rent

When is it reasonable to make a possession order? asks James Driscoll

In order to recover possession against a tenant with security of tenure, it is a fundamental principle that the ground for possession must be proved and also, crucially, that it is reasonable to make an order. This was established by the Rent Acts and continued by later housing legislation.

Under the Rent Act 1977 (RA 1977), a landlord can only recover possession against a tenant if the tenant is provided with suitable alternative accommodation, or if one of what are sometimes described as the discretionary grounds for possession set out in RA 1977, Sch 15, such as rent arrears, is proved.

In either case it must be reasonable to make an order for possession. There are also a number of mandatory grounds where possession must be ordered if the relevant ground is made out (Sch 15, Pt 2).

Similarly, under the Housing Act 1985 (HA 1985) a court can only order possession against a secure tenant where a specific ground for possession has been proved and it is reasonable

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll