header-logo header-logo

11 June 2009
Issue: 7373 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Costs
printer mail-detail

MoJ proceed with Crown Court testing

Legal aid

The Ministry of Justice announced this week that it will proceed with proposals outlined in its consultation paper, Crown Court Means Testing. This means defendants will pay legal aid contributions if they have annual disposable income of more than £3,398, capital assets of more than £3,000, or £30,000 of equity in their homes. If acquitted, the money would be paid back with interest. Acquitted defendants who do not qualify for legal aid or want to pay privately will no longer be able to recover all of their costs.

Justice Minister Lord Bach says: “We have been listening to those involved in the criminal justice system and the general public, who in the majority support this approach...The reforms we are making to legal aid are part of our promise to deliver real help now to those most in need, while developing an economically sustainable system that ensures fair and equitable access to all.”

However, legal campaign group JUSTICE condemned the plans for “undermining the principle of innocent until proven guilty”. Senior legal officer Sally Ireland says: “Innocent people should not suffer financially because the
state has decided to prosecute them. Defendants should only pay costs once they are convicted.”

Issue: 7373 / Categories: Legal News , Legal services , Costs
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll