header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 167, Issue 7742

12 April 2017
IN THIS ISSUE

Dunnett Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2017] EWCA Civ 192, [2017] All ER (D) 27 (Apr)

Bank of Scotland plc v Hazel and another [2016] Lexis Citation 711, [2016] All ER (D) 212 (Oct)

How can we ensure criminal justice co-operation with the EU post-Brexit, asks Andrew Langdon QC

Ian Smith considers recent key employment decisions

Kitcatt and others v MMS UK Holdings Ltd and another [2017] EWHC 675 (Comm), [2017] All ER (D) 36 (Apr)

Supreme Court holds publishers must pay their opponents’ success fees & ATE insurance

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll