header-logo header-logo

12 April 2017
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-detail

Market access post-Brexit

A framework to agree reciprocal market access in financial and professional services between the UK and EU post-Brexit has been developed jointly by a law firm and advisory group.

The framework would be underpinned by mutual recognition of each other’s regulatory and supervisory regimes, enabling firms to continue trading with minimal disruption to their customers. It has been developed by Hogan Lovells and the International Regulatory Strategy Group (IRSG), and is set out in a paper published this week, Mutual recognition—a basis for market access after Brexit.

The paper covers criteria for access, mechanisms for maintaining regulatory alignment and dispute resolution. It suggests basing criteria for access on existing global standards such as those set by the Basel Committee on Banking Standards. A joint UK-EU forum could be established to monitor regulation and supervision, including input into proposed new legislation. It sets out a range of dispute resolution models.

Rachel Kent, partner at Hogan Lovells, said: “Earlier this year the IRSG concluded that the focus of the government’s Brexit negotiations should be on delivering a bespoke UK-EU deal rather than reforming or adapting existing EU third country equivalence regimes for market access. This follow up report develops how a bespoke arrangement could work in practise.”

Issue: 7742 / Categories: Legal News , Brexit , EU
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll