As the Court of Appeal widens the application of the Montgomery consent test, Philippa Luscombe explores the implications for claimants
AB v Her Majesty’s Advocate (Scotland) [2017] UKSC 25, [2017] All ER (D) 14 (Apr)
PP v Home Office and another [2017] EWHC 663 (QB), [2017] All ER (D) 18 (Apr)
Jonathan Herring considers a tragic case concerning the right to withhold invasive medical treatment
Thales UK Ltd v Thales Pension Trustees Ltd and others [2017] EWHC 666 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 21 (Apr)
Finding the suit that’s right for you requires a little thought & consideration, as Dale Rhodes explains
Isle of Wight Council v Platt [2017] UKSC 28, [2017] All ER (D) 20 (Apr)
Alec Samuels suggests a solution to the problems at the Bar
Essop and others v Home Office (UK Border Agency); Naeem v Secretary of State for Justice [2017] UKSC 27, [2017] All ER (D) 12 (Apr)
Andrew Francis offers some best practice guidance when advising developers on applications under s 84 of the Law of Property Act 1925
MOVERS & SHAKERS
Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch
Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice
Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr
Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team
Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown
Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team
NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)
NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
