header-logo header-logo

Town & country planning

14 April 2017
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Dunnett Investments Ltd v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government [2017] EWCA Civ 192, [2017] All ER (D) 27 (Apr)

The Court of Appeal dismissed the claimant’s appeal, which arose from the second defendant local planning authority’s purported refusal of its application for change of use of a site from Class B1(a), namely offices, to Class C3, namely dwelling houses, and for a lawful development certificate for a Class C3, on the basis that a condition imposed in February 2005 excluded rights under the Town and Country Planning (General Permitted Development) Order 1995 (SI 1995/418) (the 1995 order) and that the condition restricted the use of the site to B1 only. The court agreed with the lower court and held that, on its proper construction, the planning condition in question excluded the operation of the 1995 order. It held that, the natural and ordinary meaning of the words used was that the condition allowed planning permission for other uses, but restricted to that obtained upon application from the local planning authority, and excluded planning permission granted by the Secretary of State by means of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC

A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones

Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn

Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn Premium Content

Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team

NEWS

Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown

Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event

back-to-top-scroll