header-logo header-logo

12 April 2017
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Solicitors prefer costs management to fixed recoverable costs

Costs management has had a negative impact on litigation but it is still preferable to fixed recoverable costs.

That’s the opinion of the majority of personal injury and commercial litigation solicitors at top 200 firms, according to The Costs Management Survey 2017 by Just Costs Solicitors. Some 90% of personal injury solicitors and 78% of commercial litigation solicitors prefer costs management to fixed recoverable costs.

Phil Bradbury, head of costs management at Just Costs, said: “There’s no love or affection for the process, but it’s better the devil you know.” He said the survey results had also thrown up concerns among the majority of respondents about “a lack of consistency in the judicial approach towards costs management”.

“The lack of guidance as to what proportionate costs means and the fact many judges are still unclear on what basis they are supposed to review the parties’ budgets only serves to heighten their concerns,” he said.

The survey highlighted differing views between the 146 personal injury solicitors and 155 commercial litigators participating about their clients’ preferences. Some 65% of the former said their clients would plump for costs management, while 57% of the latter said their clients would prefer fixed costs.

Bradbury said: “Litigators feel their commercial clients would like to know the risk of financial exposure through involvement in a dispute and potential litigation, whether claiming or defending the matter. 

“The knowledge of a fixed fee would provide clarity and reassurance within the litigation and dispute resolution process, enabling them to make a decision about the best way ahead from the outset.”

Lord Justice Jackson, currently reviewing the case for fixed costs, has recommended extending fixed costs to all civil claims, including personal injury cases up to a value of £250,000. Opponents have warned this could stop solicitors taking on complex low-value cases.

See Dominic Regan interview Jackson LJ on the progress of his review in an exclusive NLJ webinar here.

Issue: 7742 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll