header-logo header-logo

12 April 2017
Issue: 7742 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Solicitors prefer costs management to fixed recoverable costs

Costs management has had a negative impact on litigation but it is still preferable to fixed recoverable costs.

That’s the opinion of the majority of personal injury and commercial litigation solicitors at top 200 firms, according to The Costs Management Survey 2017 by Just Costs Solicitors. Some 90% of personal injury solicitors and 78% of commercial litigation solicitors prefer costs management to fixed recoverable costs.

Phil Bradbury, head of costs management at Just Costs, said: “There’s no love or affection for the process, but it’s better the devil you know.” He said the survey results had also thrown up concerns among the majority of respondents about “a lack of consistency in the judicial approach towards costs management”.

“The lack of guidance as to what proportionate costs means and the fact many judges are still unclear on what basis they are supposed to review the parties’ budgets only serves to heighten their concerns,” he said.

The survey highlighted differing views between the 146 personal injury solicitors and 155 commercial litigators participating about their clients’ preferences. Some 65% of the former said their clients would plump for costs management, while 57% of the latter said their clients would prefer fixed costs.

Bradbury said: “Litigators feel their commercial clients would like to know the risk of financial exposure through involvement in a dispute and potential litigation, whether claiming or defending the matter. 

“The knowledge of a fixed fee would provide clarity and reassurance within the litigation and dispute resolution process, enabling them to make a decision about the best way ahead from the outset.”

Lord Justice Jackson, currently reviewing the case for fixed costs, has recommended extending fixed costs to all civil claims, including personal injury cases up to a value of £250,000. Opponents have warned this could stop solicitors taking on complex low-value cases.

See Dominic Regan interview Jackson LJ on the progress of his review in an exclusive NLJ webinar here.

Issue: 7742 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll