header-logo header-logo

profile-sm_7

John O'Hare

Retired costs judge
John O’Hare is a retired costs judge.
Retired costs judge
John O’Hare is a retired costs judge.
ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR
John O’Hare states some home truths about mediation
Fixed costs in intermediate track cases: how to calculate what’s recoverable, by John O’Hare
John O’Hare explores the options available to help people with financial troubles
John O’Hare examines the new law on small claims which has led to insurers paying less to lawyers
John O’Hare provides an overview of changes & duplication to disclosure procedures in the Business & Property Courts

John O’Hare on how to reduce costs which are reasonable but disproportionate

John O'Hare provides practical advice on revising a costs management budget

John O’Hare's 10-point guide to drafting a costs budget for the first CMC

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll