header-logo header-logo

profile-sm_7

John O'Hare

Retired costs judge
John O’Hare is a retired costs judge.
Retired costs judge
John O’Hare is a retired costs judge.
ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR
John O’Hare states some home truths about mediation
Fixed costs in intermediate track cases: how to calculate what’s recoverable, by John O’Hare
John O’Hare explores the options available to help people with financial troubles
John O’Hare examines the new law on small claims which has led to insurers paying less to lawyers
John O’Hare provides an overview of changes & duplication to disclosure procedures in the Business & Property Courts

John O’Hare on how to reduce costs which are reasonable but disproportionate

John O'Hare provides practical advice on revising a costs management budget

John O’Hare's 10-point guide to drafting a costs budget for the first CMC

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll