header-logo header-logo

10 October 2013 / John O'Hare
Issue: 7579 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

Making it all add up

John O'Hare provides practical advice on revising a costs management budget

Costs management budgets are not costs caps; the court will expect the parties to regularly review them and to either agree, or apply for, revisions when necessary. It is most unlikely that anyone will be able to predict all the significant developments which will later occur in the course of a case, however carefully they drafted the first budget. Practice Direction 3E, para 2.6 refers to the making of revisions (upwards or downwards) if significant developments warrant them using words of obligation: “Each party shall revise its budget.”

Revisions are likely to be agreed or allowed whenever it becomes clear that any of the assumptions listed on the first page of the budget is false. Similarly, every budget is subject to certain implied assumptions (that opponents will not serve unnecessarily prolix pleadings or witness statements, or be uncooperative as to site inspections or inspection of documents). When setting your first budget you are usually entitled to assume that your opponents will

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll