header-logo header-logo

19 July 2007
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Freshfields defends age discrimination claims

News

City law firm Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer—which is currently defending an age discrimination claim at an employment tribunal—is reportedly facing another claim from another disgruntled former partner.

According to newspaper reports, Lois Moore, a mergers and acquisitions partner who left Freshfields last year, is also suing the firm for age discrimination over changes made to the firm’s pension scheme. Her case has been deferred by the tribunal pending the outcome of the current case, brought by Peter Bloxham.

Bloxham, former head of insolvency at Freshfields, alleges that changes made to the firm’s pension arrangements for retired partners amounted to direct and indirect discrimination against older partners. He claims he was forced to retire early and take a cut in his pension.
Freshfields has already paid £24m in severance payments to 25 former partners, but Bloxham is claiming a further £4.5m compensation under the Employment Equality (Age) Regulations 2006, which came into force last October.

The employment tribunal was told that the reason Freshfields changed its pensions system—where current partners pay for retired partners’ pensions—was to alter the “size and shape” of the partnership by weeding out older partners.

Freshfields, however, says the pension reforms were a necessary compromise to fix an “extraordinarily difficult issue”.
Dinah Rose QC, who is acting as counsel for Freshfields, points out that several partners in a similar position to Bloxham voted in favour of the reforms.

Issue: 7282 / Categories: Legal News , Tribunals , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll