Jonathan Pratt
In Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489, [1954] 3 All ER 745 the dispute revolved around the potential sale of a bungalow, which Mr Ladd wished to buy from Mr Marshall.
Matthew McCahearty & Jonathan Pratt applaud the flexibility of Wrotham Park damages
Eleanor Morgan & Jonathan Pratt explore the doctrine of benefit & burden
Matt McCahearty & Jonathan Pratt recommend keeping Pt 36 offers under review
Jonathan Pratt provides a statistical analysis of recent trends in City litigation
Damages or injunctions? Willie Manners & Jonathan Pratt report
In billing disputes is the client always right? asks Jonathan Pratt
A cross undertaking in damages can prove costly, says Jonathan Pratt
MOVERS & SHAKERS
NLJ career profile: Liz McGrath KC
A good book, a glass of chilled Albarino, and being creative for pleasure help Liz McGrath balance the rigours of complex bundles and being Head of Chambers
Burges Salmon—Matthew Hancock-Jones
Firm welcomes director in its financial services financial regulatory team
Gateley Legal—Sam Meiklejohn
Partner appointment in firm’s equity capital markets team
Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need
Magic circle firms, in-house legal departments and litigation firms alike are embracing more flexible ways to manage surges of workloads, the success of Flex Legal has shown
Walkers and runners will take in some of London’s finest views at the 16th annual charity event
Law school partners with charity to give free assistance to litigants in need
Could the Labour government usher in a new era for digital assets, ask Keith Oliver, head of international, and Amalia Neenan FitzGerald, associate, Peters & Peters, in this week’s NLJ
