Jonathan Pratt
In Ladd v Marshall [1954] 1 WLR 1489, [1954] 3 All ER 745 the dispute revolved around the potential sale of a bungalow, which Mr Ladd wished to buy from Mr Marshall.
Matthew McCahearty & Jonathan Pratt applaud the flexibility of Wrotham Park damages
Eleanor Morgan & Jonathan Pratt explore the doctrine of benefit & burden
Matt McCahearty & Jonathan Pratt recommend keeping Pt 36 offers under review
Jonathan Pratt provides a statistical analysis of recent trends in City litigation
Damages or injunctions? Willie Manners & Jonathan Pratt report
In billing disputes is the client always right? asks Jonathan Pratt
A cross undertaking in damages can prove costly, says Jonathan Pratt
MOVERS & SHAKERS
Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch
Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice
Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr
Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team
Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown
Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team
NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)
NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
