header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card

Issue: Vol 167, Issue 7747

26 May 2017
IN THIS ISSUE

Guess the interest rate; coughing gender pay; Ooops; & enforcement tort.

Correia v University Hospital of North Staffordshire NHS Trust [2017] EWCA Civ 356, [2017] All ER (D) 97 (May)

EU law underpins the provision of dispute resolution to resolve property & construction disputes, says Martin Burns. So what will happen post-Brexit?

Bath v Escott [2017] EWHC 1101 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 100 (May)

In the run up to the General Election, Athelstane Aamodt explains how the Election Court operates

Neil Parpworth considers the constitutional implications of the usage of the powers contained within the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011

Jackson v Revenue and Customs Commissioners [2017] UKFTT 341 (TC), [2017] All ER (D) 103 (May)

Taylor v Taylor and another [2017] EWHC 1080 (Ch), [2017] All ER (D) 93 (May)

Amy Proferes considers overriding interests, overreaching, & the perils of the ‘registration gap’

Succeeding in today’s market requires expertise, investment & a touch of excellence, says Peter Ambrose

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll