header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card

Issue: Vol 163, Issue 7578

04 October 2013
IN THIS ISSUE

Ed Heaton reviews the current child support system & outlines developments over the last 12 months

Ian Smith reviews a group of cases on compensation for unfair dismissal & one teeming with EU-driven complications

Keith Patten investigates the complex area of law surrounding statutory employment & common law negligence

Oliver Radley-Gardner surveys the risks surrounding residential service charge regulation

When it comes to forum shopping, every little (fact) counts, say Richard Marshall & Clare Arthurs

Fee remission pain from Monday, short bankruptcies over & in-house cheer

European Commission and another v Kadi C-584/10 P, C-593/10 P and C-595/10 P, [2013] All ER (D) 411 (Jul)

London Steam Ship Owners Mutual Insurance Association Ltd v Kingdom of Spain [2013] EWHC 2840 (Comm), [2013] All ER (D) 196 (Sep)

Tidal Energy Ltd v Bank of Scotland Plc [2013] EWHC 2780 (QB), [2013] All ER (D) 214 (Sep)

European Commission v Strack C-579/12, [2013] All ER (D) 203 (Sep)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll