header-logo header-logo

04 October 2013 / Ian Smith
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Features , Employment
printer mail-detail

Hard at work

Ian Smith reviews a group of cases on compensation for unfair dismissal & one teeming with EU-driven complications

Sood Enterprises Ltd v Healy UKEATS/0015/12 is an example of a seemingly simple issue of holiday entitlement giving rise to legal complexities under the working time regulations and Directive. After a stroke in July 2010, the claimant was off sick until June 2011, when he resigned. His holiday year was the calendar year; in 2010 he had taken 11 holiday days before his illness; in 2011 he had taken nothing because of his illness. He had made no claim for holiday pay in 2010. On termination in 2011, he claimed outstanding holiday pay in lieu of untaken holiday.

The tribunal held that EU law requires the carrying over of holiday entitlement untaken because of illness, and on the basis that it is all unpaid “wages”, the claimant was entitled to 17 days’ holiday pay for 2010 and a pro-rata 14 days for 2011, ie using the full 28 days of ordinary and additional statutory leave (regs 13 and 13A) as the yardstick for calculation. The employer

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll