header-logo header-logo

04 October 2013
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

EU—Regulations—Legal basis of regulation

European Commission and another v Kadi C-584/10 P, C-593/10 P and C-595/10 P, [2013] All ER (D) 411 (Jul)

Court of Justice of the European Union (Grand Chamber), Judges Skouris (President), Lenaerts (Rapporteur and Vice-President), Ilesic, Bay Larsen, von Danwitz and Berger (Presidents of Chambers), Lohmus, Levits, Arabadjiev, Toader, Kasel, Safjan and Svaby, 18 July 2013

The Court of Justice of the European Union dismissed appeals brought by the European Commission and others which sought to set aside the judgment of the General Court of the European Union of 30 September 2010, by which that Court had annulled Commission Regulation (EC) 1190/2008 of 28 November 2008 amending regulations imposing certain specific restrictive measures directed against Osama bin Laden, the Al-Qaeda network and the Taliban, in so far as that measure concerned the respondent, Mr Kadi. 

K had been identified as an individual associated with Osama bin Laden and the Al-Qaeda network. In October 2001, he was listed on the Sanctions Committee Consolidated List. His name was subsequently added to the list in Annex I to Council Regulation (EC) 467/2001

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll