header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card

Issue: Vol 163, Issue 7574

05 September 2013
IN THIS ISSUE

"Wembridge Claimants” and others v Winter and another [2013] EWHC 2331 (QB), [2013] All ER (D) 04 (Aug)

Bilta (UK) Ltd (in liquidation) and others v Nazir and others [2013] EWCA Civ 968, [2013] All ER (D) 390 (Jul)
 

Roger Smith measures the impact of legal aid cuts on both sides of the Atlantic

Is it appropriate to make an order for costs against a non-party to family proceedings, asks Claire Sanders

Should we call time on zero hours contracts, asks Sarah Johnson

Katherine Waller investigates the potentially “puzzling” area surrounding notices to complete

R (on the application of MA & ors) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2013] EWHC 2213 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 373 (Jul)
 

Re G (a child) (care order: proportionality) [2013] EWCA Civ 965, [2013] All ER (D) 375 (Jul)

Fenty and others v Arcadia Group and another [2013] EWHC 2310 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 410 (Jul)

Mohammed Saleem Tariq & Anton van Dellen reflect on the early days of the Jackson reforms

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll