header-logo header-logo

05 September 2013 / Claire Sanders
Issue: 7574 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

Taking orders

Is it appropriate to make an order for costs against a non-party to family proceedings, asks Claire Sanders

Since 1 April 2013, when legal aid became unavailable for private children cases (unless they fall within the domestic violence exception) the issue of costs has become all the more relevant to parties who are now struggling to fund proceedings themselves. In HP v PB,OP and the London Borough of Croydon [2013] EWHC 1956 (Fam) [2013] All ER (D) 138 (Jul) the High Court had to decide whether it was appropriate to make an order for costs against a non-party to the proceedings, in that case a local authority, whose role in the proceedings had been limited to the production of a report.

Facts

The parents of a six-year-old child made cross applications under the Children Act 1989 (ChA 1989), s 8. During the course of the proceedings the father made allegations that the mother had fabricated illnesses in respect of herself and the child. The district judge directed the local authority, to prepare and file a report under ChA 1989, s 37. A s 37 report

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll