header-logo header-logo

05 September 2013
Issue: 7574 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Fire brigade

"Wembridge Claimants” and others v Winter and another [2013] EWHC 2331 (QB), [2013] All ER (D) 04 (Aug)

Properly construed, under the Fire and Rescue Services Act 2004, the “health and safety regulations” could amend a duty under existing statutory provisions and, thus, breach of health and safety regulations would be actionable, save where the contrary was expressly excluded. Fire and rescue services had not been expressly excluded from the Act. Further, there was no necessary implication that no civil liability arose, either at common law or by the imposition of regulation, because the Act contained “target duties” only.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll