header-logo header-logo

The great escape

Gross misconduct is no barrier to pay in lieu of notice, notes Anna Macey

In Cavenagh v William Evans Limited [2012] EWCA Civ 697 Duncan Cavenagh was the managing director of William Evans Limited. Exercising a clause in Cavenagh’s contract, the company summarily terminated his employment, acknowledging their contractual obligation to pay Cavanagh six months’ pay in lieu of notice (PILON).

Before the £65,000 due was paid, the company became aware that two months before the termination, Cavenagh had authorised a transfer of £10,000 from company funds to his pension provider. The company refused to pay the PILON, and Cavenagh sued for the payment as a debt due under his contract.

Boston Deep Sea Fishing

Boston Deep Sea Fishing and Ice Co v Ansell (1888) 39 Ch D 339, as the Court of Appeal acknowledged, is a leading authority for many of the principles governing dismissal for gross misconduct. It established that an employee may be dismissed summarily for gross misconduct, and critically that an employer can defend a claim for wrongful dismissal by reliance on facts not known

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll