header-logo header-logo

28 March 2013 / Martin Burns
Issue: 7554 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Best person for the job?

Martin Burns highlights the benefits of appointing a commercial mediator

There is no doubt that mediation of commercial disputes is on the government agenda, and its promise to reduce costs and promote consensus is genuinely attractive. But is mediation ever going to really stack up as a viable alternative to the courts?

The problem for mediation is that it has not been properly embraced by lawyers and used as a matter of routine. The history of mediation in the UK over the past 20 years suggests this is not going to happen anytime soon.

Lawyers know how to litigate. It is what they are trained to do. The courts are their comfort zone. Litigation is the lawyer’s natural state of mind and it is normal for them to advise their clients to litigate rather than mediate. It is also understandable that lawyers who act as mediators will often struggle to move out of an adversarial mindset, and find it difficult to adopt an approach that is all about patiently facilitating an amicable settlement which satisfies both parties.

Separate litigation system?

So, maybe

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll