header-logo header-logo

Michael Zander KC

Emeritus professor

Michael Zander KC, NLJ columnist & Emeritus Professor, LSE. Newlawjournal.co.uk

Emeritus professor

Michael Zander KC, NLJ columnist & Emeritus Professor, LSE. Newlawjournal.co.uk

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

Michael Zander QC considers the oral arguments in the Art 50 court case

Does triggering Art 50 require a prior Act of Parliament, asks Michael Zander QC

In the first of an occasional series, Michael Zander reviews the House of Lords’ debate on Brexit

If Brexit withdrawal cannot be reversed the UK is at risk of a seriously bad outcome, explains Michael Zander QC​

The House of Lords have questioned the constitutional implications of a British Bill of Rights, notes Michael Zander QC

Michael Zander QC on the Home Secretary’s attempt to justify withdrawal from the ECHR while remaining in the EU

Michael Zander QC considers an interesting contribution to the debate on scrapping the Human Rights Act

A Bill of Rights is not to be messed with: Michael Zander on the Tory plan to scrap the Human Rights Act

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll