header-logo header-logo

28 May 2015 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7655 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

With friends like these…

nlj_7655_zander

Who will be guiding Mr Gove regarding a British Bill of Rights asks Michael Zander QC

So scrapping the Human Rights Act is not after all to be the subject of a Bill in this session of Parliament. But according to the Queen’s Speech, proposals will be brought forward for a British Bill of Rights—and we are told that there is to be “consultation”. If the reason was calculation that a Bill would not win a Commons majority, the project may never emerge from the long grass. But it is possible that Michael Gove, the new Lord Chancellor, does mean business and genuinely wants to consult in order “to get it right”. 

The issue bristles with difficulties. He is himself a layman—the second non-lawyer Lord Chancellor. But he has two lawyer junior ministers, Lord Faulks and Mr Dominic Raab, both of whom are personally persuaded of the need for radical human rights reform. 

Faulks

Edward Faulks QC, aged 64, created a Conservative peer in 2010, is Minister of State for Civil Justice. He was a member of the Commission on a Bill

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll