header-logo header-logo

24 July 2015 / Michael Zander KC
Issue: 7662 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Telling porky pies

nlj_7662_comment

Michael Zander considers some classic instances of lies told about the Human Rights Act

The Human Rights Act 1998 came into force in October 2000. A mere 15 years later the Conservative Government aims to abolish the Act. The popular press has played a major role in demonising the Act. Over and over again it has peddled false stories, gleefully and irresponsibly then taken up by politicians.

Catgate

The best known perhaps is “catgate”—Home Secretary, Theresa May, telling the Conservative Party Conference in 2011 of the illegal immigrant “who cannot be deported because—and I am not making this up—he had pet a cat”. It is true that the first immigration judge in his judgment mentioned joint purchase of Maya the cat as one of the many indications that the illegal immigrant had an established relationship with his partner—but it was not the reason for that judge’s decision and in the judgment on appeal the cat was not even mentioned. The reason he could not be deported was that the UK Border Agency had not followed the rules. Ken Clarke, the then justice secretary,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll