header-logo header-logo

profile-sm_7

Dr Chris Pamplin

Editor

Dr Chris Pamplin is the editor of the UK Register of Expert Witnesses (jspubs.com; nlj@jspubs.com). Newlawjournal.co.uk

Editor

Dr Chris Pamplin is the editor of the UK Register of Expert Witnesses (jspubs.com; nlj@jspubs.com). Newlawjournal.co.uk

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

Is a Crown expert witness part of the team or independent? Chris Pamplin looks at the costs implications

Chris Pamplin considers the question of expert confidentiality & trade secrets

When instructing a new expert, is disclosure of an earlier report inevitable? Dr Chris Pamplin reports

Dr Chris Pamplin analyses the results of the 2017 UK Register of Expert Witnesses’ expert witness survey

Dr Chris Pamplin looks at how far a judge can go in taking a proactive role towards experts in proceedings

Post-Squier, Chris Pamplin reflects on the use of previous judgments in disciplinary proceedings

Chris Pamplin looks for the lessons to draw from an expert witness who spoke against perceived wisdom & got into deep water

Chris Pamplin takes a broad view of the possible implications for expert witnesses of Britain’s exit from the EU

Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll