Dr Chris Pamplin

Editor

Dr Chris Pamplin is the editor of the UK Register of Expert Witnesses (jspubs.com; nlj@jspubs.com). Newlawjournal.co.uk

Editor

Dr Chris Pamplin is the editor of the UK Register of Expert Witnesses (jspubs.com; nlj@jspubs.com). Newlawjournal.co.uk

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

Go to page of 9

Dr Chris Pamplin finds courts are less draconian on delays in evidence where parties are not at fault

Dr Chris Pamplin considers the test of reasonableness under CPR 35.1 when calling expert evidence

Judges need to be on firm ground when disregarding good & persuasive expert evidence, as Dr Chris Pamplin explains

Dr Chris Pamplin maps the results & gauges the mood of this year’s UK Register of Expert Witnesses’ survey

Chris Pamplin serves up a master class on how to avoid diary clashes in & out of court

Chris Pamplin explains why mentoring schemes must be disclosed

Chris Pamplin explains how the courts might handle experts who appear to have failed in their duty

Are the courts softening their approach to late changes to experts? Dr Chris Pamplin reports

Show

Results

Go to page of 9

MOVERS & SHAKERS

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS

Pro Bono Week marks silver jubilee

The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK

NLJ this week: Pro bono’s silver lining

Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice

NLJ this week: Wrong expert, costly exit

Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case

Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues

NLJ this week: Discounted damages, different costs

A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims