header-logo header-logo

08 November 2018 / Dr Chris Pamplin
Issue: 7816 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

Playing by the rules: experts’ duty of candour

​Chris Pamplin explains how the courts might handle experts who appear to have failed in their duty

  • Solicitors can face a formal procedure in which they have to show why they should not be referred to their regulatory body.
  • A recent case has suggested that expert witnesses should be subjected to similar procedures.

The ability of the court to report a failing expert to a professional body with a view to considering disciplinary procedures is long established. But it is less common for the court to conduct its own investigation into an expert’s conduct. As officers of the Supreme Court, solicitors can face a formal procedure in which they have to show why they should not be referred to their regulatory body. It has been suggested in a recent case that expert witnesses should be subject to a similar procedure.

The circumstances in which solicitors can be made subject to such formal enquiries and the steps that can be taken by the court are set out in R (on the application of Hamid) v Secretary of State

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll