header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card

Issue: Vol 168, Issue 7816

09 November 2018
IN THIS ISSUE

Users of expert accountants’ reports need to subject them to critical scrutiny. George Sim explains how & why

​Chris Pamplin explains how the courts might handle experts who appear to have failed in their duty

Mark Solon offers tips on how to make sure your expert witness keeps up to date

Two out of three: the Court of Appeal rules in favour of a multinational parent company…again. Nicole Finlayson & Charlotte Hill report

Rectification: a duty to correct other people’s mistakes? Tamsin Cox & Julia Petrenko report

​Shane Crawford discusses the proposals to tackle workplace sexual harassment

​David Locke reflects on the ramifications of the recent public intervention of Lord Hain in breaching an injunction

In the first part of an exclusive NLJ series, Jon Robins reports on the precarious reality of the poor (& not-so-poor) in our society & their quest for justice post LASPO

Solicitors can now practise from unregulated firms, despite protests

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll