header-logo header-logo

An alternative route

Chris Bryden & Michael Salter advise how employees can make a successful claim for injury to feelings

It is trite law that a claimant who is successful in convincing an employment tribunal that their dismissal was unfair, within the meaning of the Employment Rights Act 1996 (ERA 1996), is not entitled to receive, as part of their compensatory award, any damages for stress or injury to feelings that arise as a result of the manner of their dismissal. The House of Lords, as was, made this point clear in Dunnachie v Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council [2004] UKHL 36, [2004] 3 All ER 1011. The reasoning is that s 123 of ERA 1996, which governs the compensatory award, does not permit recovery of non-financial losses. However, there is a mechanism by which such a claimant could obtain from the court an award of compensation for injury to feelings caused by their dismissal in appropriate circumstances.

The Protection from Harassment Act 1997 (PHA 1997) permits the recovery of compensation by a claimant where the wrongdoer has carried out a course of conduct

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll