header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 159, Issue 7395

25 November 2009
IN THIS ISSUE

R(L) demonstrates justifiable interference with Article 8 rights, says Nicholas Dobson

Paul Hewitt, Paola Fudakowska & Adam Cloherty examine rectification & statutory wills

Michael Tringham predicts the future for inheritance law

Companies are bracing themselves for greater exposure to both litigation & regulatory proceedings say Antony Corsi & Kirill Vahoni

Jonathan Scriven analyses the need to balance a claimant’s immediate capital needs against their long term financial security

Timothy Carlisle & Christian Hay provide an update on the choice of law jurisdiction made by agreement

Matt McCahearty & Jonathan Pratt recommend keeping Pt 36 offers under review

Dr Clare McConnell assesses the threats & challenges facing law firms

Mayhaven Healthcare Ltd v Bothma and another (trading as DAB Builders) [2009] EWHC 2634 (TCC), [2009] All ER (D) 163 (Nov)

Peter Vaines explains the Queen’s speech

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll