header-logo header-logo

What about the elephant?

26 November 2009 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7395 / Categories: Blogs , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

Peter Vaines explains the Queen’s speech

Knock knock knock! Was this the porter from Macbeth or a reference to For Whom the Bell Tolls? Actually it was Black Rod knocking at the door of the House of Commons, but the message was the same.

Come in number 99 your time is up. Gordon Brown did not look happy.

He should have been.

This was effectively the first speech of the election campaign and he had the Queen of England reading it for him. She did not look very happy about it either but she is much too polite to say so.
The State Opening of Parliament is one of our great state occasions dating back to the 16th century. It encapsulates centuries of tradition and the relationship between the Monarch and Parliament.

It culminates in the delivery of the Queens Speech when the Monarch outlines the governments programme for the coming session. However, this was never going to be a speech of substance.

There is practically no chance that anything mentioned in the Queen’s Speech will become law because of the proximity of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll