header-logo header-logo

26 November 2009 / Peter Vaines
Issue: 7395 / Categories: Blogs , Constitutional law
printer mail-detail

What about the elephant?

Peter Vaines explains the Queen’s speech

Knock knock knock! Was this the porter from Macbeth or a reference to For Whom the Bell Tolls? Actually it was Black Rod knocking at the door of the House of Commons, but the message was the same.

Come in number 99 your time is up. Gordon Brown did not look happy.

He should have been.

This was effectively the first speech of the election campaign and he had the Queen of England reading it for him. She did not look very happy about it either but she is much too polite to say so.
The State Opening of Parliament is one of our great state occasions dating back to the 16th century. It encapsulates centuries of tradition and the relationship between the Monarch and Parliament.

It culminates in the delivery of the Queens Speech when the Monarch outlines the governments programme for the coming session. However, this was never going to be a speech of substance.

There is practically no chance that anything mentioned in the Queen’s Speech will become law because of the proximity of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll