header-logo header-logo

Jennifer James fails to find justice at the check-out queue

Is there a route to justice for victims of internet libel, asks Peter Thompson QC

Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary by Roderick Ramage

HLE blogger Elaine Freer defends the criminal justice system

Dominic Regan delves into the sometimes illogical world of vicarious liability law

James Wilson remembers one of New Zealand’s most infamous true crimes

Philip Coppel QC looks into the Lord of Appeal who brought Atkin’s Court Forms into being 75 years ago

Tom Bell debates the pros & cons of disapplying CPR 36.14

James Wilson examines the battle to reveal Harold Godwinson’s resting place

Snippets from The Reduced Law Dictionary by Roderick Ramage

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll