header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card

Issue: Vol 159, Issue 7375

25 June 2009
IN THIS ISSUE

John Cooper puts identity cards and surveillance under the spotlight

In times of recession, proportionality over the use of experts is critical,
says Ayla Dogruyol

Brent McDonald examines pupils’ supervision in school, setting aside consent orders & the latest case on limitation

Gray v Thames Trains and others [2009] UKHL 33, [2009] All ER (D) 162 (Jun)

Author of a Blog v Times Newspapers Ltd [2009] EWHC 1358 (QB), [2009] All ER (D) 155 (Jun)

Digital Copyright and the Consumer Revolution—Hands off my iPod: Dr Matthew Rimmer

Part seven: Mark Solon on the dilemma of choosing a new single joint expert

Daniel Ryan & Noel Matthews look at mitigating the costs of expert evidence

Music and Copyright: Ronald S. Rosen

It’s been entered into the hymn books of third party liability insurers and could become a resident feature of responses to personal injury protocol letters of claim—Walton v Kirk [2009] EWHC 703, [2009] All ER (D) 70 (Apr).

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll