header-logo header-logo

26 June 2009 / Ayla Dogruyol
Issue: 7375 / Categories: Features , Family , Property
printer mail-detail

Use your experts wisely

In times of recession, proportionality over the use of experts is critical,
says Ayla Dogruyol

Married couples are continuing to separate despite the financial difficulties of doing so when assets have devalued and may not be readily realisable. Some will be concerned about the cost implications of formalising their separation and this article highlights two practical steps which parties can consider to contain costs when doing a deal in relation to the finances.

The judge at a final hearing bases his decision on the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973, s 25 which requires consideration of the financial resources available to the parties now and in the foreseeable future. Consequently, at the outset of any settlement discussions the parties should be satisfied that all the assets have been disclosed. They then have to work out what those assets are worth.

Experts

Parties are first encouraged to try to agree the value of the family assets. In the absence of agreement, or if they do not know the value of the assets, the preferred court direction is for a single joint expert (SJE) to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll