header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 166, Issue 7721

04 November 2016
IN THIS ISSUE

Firm announces new joint managing partner

Firm welcomes former senior prosecutor from FCA & CMA

Pensions expert joins firm as demand in sector soars

Charity strengthens leadership team with appointment of general counsel

Costs orders: who pays & when, asks Kerry Underwood

    Show
    10
    Results
    Results
    10
    Results

    MOVERS & SHAKERS

    Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

    Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

    Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

    Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

    Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

    Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

    Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

    Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

    Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

    NEWS

    NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

    HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

    NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
    Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
    From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
    Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
    Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
    back-to-top-scroll