header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card

Issue: Vol 163, Issue 7564

14 June 2013
IN THIS ISSUE

David Greene takes issue with excessive & ineffective political grandstanding

Nicholas Dobson considers the lessons we can learn from Sally Bercow’s mishap

Sejal Raja provides an update on post-employment victimisation protection

The High Court has provided guidance on the correct approach to assessing an occupier’s duty of care relating to foreseeable risk. Henry Morton Jack reports

Holland Park provides a lesson in restrictive covenants, says Andrew Francis

Early determination should be considered, but only if conditions are right, says Tom Henderson

Claim early for sacking, overriding objective strikes, well done Phipson & financial remedy abuse

Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom (App. No. 48876/08) [2013] ECHR 48876/08, [2013] All ER (D) 21 (May)

R (on the application of NR) v Local Government Ombudsman [2013] EWHC 1335 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 18 (Jun)

Vallee v Birchwood [2013] EWHC 1449 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 46 (Jun)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll