header-logo header-logo

13 June 2013 / Henry Morton Jack
Issue: 7564 / Categories: Features , Landlord&tenant
printer mail-detail

In deep water

The High Court has provided guidance on the correct approach to assessing an occupier’s duty of care relating to foreseeable risk. Henry Morton Jack reports

In Ryan Andrew Cockbill v David Riley [2013] EWHC 656 (QB), the claimant, who was born on 17 June 1990, sustained a catastrophic spinal injury in an accident on 20 July 2006, while attending a party at the defendant’s home to celebrate, along with the defendant’s daughter and others, the end of their GCSE examinations. The claimant entered a large paddling pool in the garden and suffered a serious hyperflexion injury resulting in a fracture of the spine and consequent incomplete tetraplegia. The defendant, who was present throughout the evening, had bought a limited amount of alcoholic drink, namely a 12-pack of small bottles of Budweiser beer and 12 bottles of Vodka Kick.

The pool in which the claimant suffered injury had been brought by one of the guests and filled by the defendant. The claimant had not taken swimwear to the party and did not know there would be a paddling pool provided. He arrived at about

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll