header-logo header-logo

19 March 2015
Categories: Legal News , Divorce , Ancillary relief
printer mail-detail

Wyatt v Vince: lawyers predict modest payout if claim successful

Family lawyers have predicted the ex-wife of a windmill millionaire may only win a small payout after her surprising victory at the Supreme Court. Wyatt v Vince [2015] UKSC 14 concerned an unusual set of circumstances. Ms Wyatt separated from Mr Vince in 1984 and divorced him in 1992 when he was a new age traveller living in a disused ambulance. She brought up their children in straitened circumstances while Mr Vince went on to develop a successful windmill business and is now a multi-millionaire.

Michael Gouriet, partner in Withers' Family law team, says: “The judgment merely stresses that Ms Wyatt is entitled to be heard and the key resulting question is whether she will now get any retrospective award in recognition of her contribution for raising their son. The judgment warns of the 'formidable difficulties' she faces in this regard, but the hint at fairness indicates that she may not leave empty-handed.” (See this week's comment Time to reflect?)

 

 

 

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll