header-logo header-logo

17 August 2022
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity
printer mail-detail

Working class professionals held back

Talented people from lower socio-economic backgrounds continue to face major obstacles to career progression at senior levels in the UK financial and professional services, research shows

The City of London Socio-Economic Diversity Taskforce published a major report on the issue last week, the first report of its kind to focus on socio-economic diversity.

It found 64% of senior leaders surveyed were from a family with a professional background―nearly double the proportion (37%) of the UK population.

Among senior employees, 26% attended fee-paying schools, which is three times the national average of 7.5%, while 20% of junior-level and 16% of mid-level respondents attended fee-paying schools.

Of those respondents from a working-class background, 37% felt their background had held them back at work, compared to 18% from a professional background. Employees from working class backgrounds felt less able to be themselves at work, were more likely to feel like an outsider, more likely to feel that their background negatively impacted their career and more likely to feel that they did not have the same chances of success in the workplace.

Just 1% of respondents in senior positions were ethnic minority women from working-class backgrounds.

In the legal sector, statistics from Solicitors Regulation Authority show 58% of lawyers working in law firms are from a professional background (compared to 37% nationally) and 23% of lawyers attended a fee-paying school.

I Stephanie Boyce, president of the Law Society, which sits on the City of London Socio-Economic Diversity Taskforce, said: ‘The report draws urgent attention to the need for professional services―including the legal sector―to improve their socio-economic diversity to ensure we reflect the society we serve.

‘Working class people―who were under-represented across organisations and at senior levels―reported feeling less included in the workplace. As a child brought up in a single-parent household on a council estate I can understand why people from similar backgrounds may feel left out in the workplace.

‘Not having the connections others may have had made it more difficult for me to break into and progress in the legal sector. We need to act now to ensure there is socio-economic diversity at all levels. Doing nothing is not an option.’

Boyce said the Law Society is launching a ‘Social Mobility Web Hub’, which will provide practical and expert resources to help organisations promote socio-economic diversity.

The Taskforce is due to publish its recommendations later this year. Find out more about the Taskforce here.

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll