header-logo header-logo

03 February 2023 / Ranjit Dhindsa
Issue: 8011 / Categories: Features , Profession , Career focus , Diversity , Equality
printer mail-detail

Women in the boardroom: driving change at the top

108802
Are quotas an effective way of addressing gender imbalances in senior roles? Ranjit Dhindsa examines the law & weighs up the pros & cons

In brief

  • The Council of the EU has adopted the ‘Women on Boards’ Directive.
  • What will the Directive change, and to whom does it apply?
  • Do gender quotas work, and what are the downsides?

The Council of the EU adopted the ‘Women on Boards’ Directive (the Directive) in October 2022, ten years after it was first proposed by the EU Commission, which is aimed at improving the gender imbalance among directors and those in senior roles in listed companies. 

Although the Directive may not be directly applicable in the UK, it will have an impact for the following reasons:

  • Publicity: it is receiving publicity and there is awareness of it both in Europe and the UK,
  • Expectations: this publicity creates an expectation and a slight pressure. Employees, shareholders and investors who operate throughout Europe and the UK will have similar expectations of UK businesses.
  • Reputation:
If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll