header-logo header-logo

13 February 2026 / Mark Pawlowski
Issue: 8149 / Categories: Features , Dispute resolution
printer mail-detail

Winners & losers!

242551
Mark Pawlowski takes a look at some of the legal pitfalls associated with lottery syndicates

It is not uncommon for a number of people to form a syndicate to subscribe for weekly tickets to the National Lottery. Invariably, there will be no written rules of the syndicate and the members will rarely consider the question of how any winnings (large or small) should be divided, particularly in the event of a member failing to pay the required sum or if the required subscription is paid not by the member themselves but by a partner or friend. To whom will the winnings belong in these circumstances?

It’s all mine!

In Abrahams v Trustee of the property of Abrahams [1999] Lexis Citation 3432, the claimant, who was separated from her husband, paid £1 a week for her own place in a lottery syndicate, plus a further £1 for her husband. The syndicate won over £3m , and the claimant’s one-fifteenth share amounted to £242,155.13. The claimant, however, also claimed her husband’s share, relying on the presumption of a resulting trust on the ground that she

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll