header-logo header-logo

Why exiting the Energy Charter Treaty will hinder clean energy transition

172553
Contrary to popular belief, leaving the Energy Charter Treaty will not assist achieving net zero. Timothy Foden & Nessa Salvador explain why
  • The UK intends to withdraw from the Energy Charter Treaty.
  • Failed efforts to modernise the Energy Charter Treaty to align with the UK’s net zero policy were the reason behind its withdrawal.
  • This decision is likely to hinder rather than promote Europe’s sustainability energy transition, as well as impede the UK’s own net zero policy.

The UK announced in February that it intends to withdraw from the Energy Charter Treaty (ECT), an international agreement for cooperation in the energy industry. In so doing, it cited failed efforts to modernise the ECT to align with the UK’s net zero policy as its reason for withdrawal. The decision is disappointing and is likely to hinder rather than promote Europe’s sustainable energy transition. Post-Brexit, the UK had a serious opportunity to act as a launch-pad for sustainable energy investment into Europe. Instead of carving its own path, the UK has sheepishly followed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll