header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
06 August 2021 / Bryan Clark
Issue: 7944 / Categories: Features , Procedure & practice , Mediation , ADR
printer mail-detail

The role of lawyers in mediation: whose child is it anyway?

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
54502
Post-Kumar, Bryan Clark considers the use of legal representation within mediation when individuals are pitted against institutions
  • The right of a parent in to be represented in an additional support needs mediation by a lawyer under the Children and Families Act.
  • Pros and cons of involving lawyers in mediation.

The case of Kumar v London Borough of Hillingdon [2020] EWHC 3326 (admin), [2020] All ER (D) 34 (Dec) entailed a judicial review brought by Kumar against her local authority. The matter at hand concerned the use of mediation in the Special Education Needs (SEN) context under the Children and Families Act 2014 (CFA 2014). The particular issue in question was whether the local authority had acted lawfully in refusing Kumar’s request to be represented in the mediation by a solicitor. While this case represents an interesting exercise in statutory interpretation it also holds a wider resonance about the utility of legal representation within mediation.

Facts of the case

Kumar’s son, a child with complex, special educational needs had been issued

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: No such thing as a ‘Welsh seat’
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
NLJ this week: Jury reform risks justice for efficiency’s sake
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
NLJ this week: Crypto fightback offers ‘new frontier for law’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
NLJ this week: Time to revive the duty to report crime?
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
NLJ this week: When are experts truly ‘necessary’?
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll