header-logo header-logo

03 July 2025
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Diversity , Career focus
printer mail-detail

Who are the judges? LCJ pledges to improve representation

‘Progress is too slow’ on judicial diversity, the Lady Chief Justice, Baroness Carr has said

Nearly one in eight of all judges are now from ethnic minority backgrounds (12% of the total, up from 7% in 2015). However, representation of Black judges has remained at 1% of all judges, according to the judicial diversity statistics 2024-2025, published this week.

Solicitors are generally under-represented in the judiciary and tended to fare less well in judicial selection exercises. Roughly speaking, the courts judiciary is composed of 70% barristers and 30% solicitors. In the tribunals judiciary, the split is roughly 40% barristers and 60% solicitors. Taken together, the judiciary as a whole is made up 60% barristers to 40% solicitors.

Women are proportionately represented in all but the highest echelons of the judiciary—44% of all judges but only 23% in the Court of Appeal (nine Lady Justices) and 30% in the High Court (32 judges).

Among magistrates, both women and ethnic minority representation is higher than among the rest of the judiciary—57% of magistrates are women, and 14% are ethnic minority.

One in ten judges (8% in courts and 15% in tribunals) reported they are disabled. Insufficient numbers of judges declared their socio-economic background to meet the 60% threshold for publication.

Baroness Carr said: ‘I am determined to improve diversity in the judiciary. It is one of my key priorities… we will persist in our efforts to make real change.’

Law Society president, Richard Atkinson said: ‘Significant progress is still required before the judiciary can truly represent the wider society.

‘The representation of Black legal professionals on the bench has remained stubbornly stagnant for over a decade, showing that efforts to make improvements are not having the desired impact. More work needs to be done.

‘Solicitors are continuing to achieve appointments as judges at disproportionately low rates compared with barristers and the numbers are falling. Our concerns remain that until this percentage significantly increases, we will struggle to persuade our members that entry to the judiciary is a level playing field.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll