header-logo header-logo

22 March 2023
Issue: 8018 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Damages , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

Whiplash settlements at slow pace

Personal injury lawyers have highlighted problems with the Official Injury Claims (OIC) portal, including a rise in the average settlement time.

The OIC, which launched alongside wider whiplash reforms in May 2021, is used for road traffic accident injury claims worth less than £5,000. 

According to quarterly data (up to December 2022) published by the OIC last week, the volume of cases is rising, with 22,630 claims during the quarter compared to a total of 76,873 since it launched.

However, the figures also show a steady rise in the average settlement time from 45.2 days in the OIC’s first quarter after launch to, in subsequent quarters, 85 days, 139 days, 175 days, 208 days and, in the most recent quarter, 227 days.

The OIC report states: ‘This is to be expected as we are now seeing cases settle with more complex injuries and longer prognoses. It is likely to continue to rise.’

The Justice Committee began an inquiry last month into the impact of the 2021 whiplash reforms and how well the OIC is working. Submitting evidence this week, CILEX warned the rise in settlement times with cases taking three-quarters of a year to resolve is ‘being seen as a norm’.

CILEX questioned the accessibility of the portal for unrepresented lay claimants, who are often unable to ‘effectively collate’ the evidence, particularly since claims may be complex and intricate. Moreover, 88% of OIC claimants are legally represented but there is no costs recovery; therefore clients must pay lawyers out of their damages, which makes the work less financially viable, resulting in small and medium-sized firms dropping out of the whiplash claims market.

CILEX president Matthew Huggett said: ‘We would like to see better legal education, advice and guidance for those using the portal and ongoing monitoring to ensure that consumer choice is not being compromised.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll