header-logo header-logo

15 February 2023
Issue: 8013 / Categories: Legal News , Personal injury , Damages , Insurance / reinsurance , Technology
printer mail-detail

Whiplash claims revisited

MPs have begun an inquiry into whether whiplash claims are being processed effectively following a series of reforms.

Personal injury lawyers campaigned against the reforms when they were announced in 2021, fearing claimants might be under-compensated and lose access to justice.

The reforms included fixed tariffs, a ban on claims without medical evidence, raising the small claims threshold from £1,000 to £5,000, and the online claims portal or Official Injury Claim Service. The aim was to halve the more than £2bn annual claims for whiplash, which insurers said added £90 to car insurance policies. Savings of between £40 and £50 per year were then to be passed on to motorists.

Sir Bob Neill, chair of the Justice Committee, said: ‘We want justice to prevail, but we want it to be efficient as well.’

The committee will ask why 90% of claimants continue to use lawyers when using the online portal, whether the portal is accessible, and whether it ensures access to justice. It will look at the effect the reforms have had on the number of minor personal injury claims to date, to what extent any savings are being passed on to motorists, and whether claims are being settled in a timely manner.

Andrew Wild, head of legal at First4InjuryClaims, said: ‘Road traffic accident claims have almost halved since 2018 but the promised savings for motorists have yet to materialise—insurance premiums have actually gone up.

‘The portal has been so poorly marketed and plagued with issues that motorists could be forgiven for giving up, particularly when the average settlement time currently stands at more than seven months.

‘An inquiry into the reforms has to be welcomed but, almost two years in, I hope this is not simply a box ticking exercise.’

Submit evidence to the inquiry by 5pm on 17 March.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll