header-logo header-logo

03 October 2013 / Peter Thompson KC
Issue: 7578 / Categories: Opinion , Banking
printer mail-detail

Whatever happened to toxic debt?

illustration_converted_2

Peter Thompson QC explains why UK taxpayers deserve an amnesty

The conventional wisdom is that in 2008 the Western economy was rocked and almost brought down by toxic assets in the stream of commerce. The classic example of a toxic asset is the sub-prime mortgage, but no less toxic is the sub-prime loan in the form of unsecured loan facilities provided by credit cards. According to Credit Action, in the UK the total sum of individual debt, secured and unsecured, rose from £1,100bn in 2005 to £1,425bn in 2008, which is roughly where it is today. Assuming, for the sake of what follows, that the increase between 2005 to 2008 was caused by the addition of seriously toxic business, we are looking at a toxic lake of about £325bn.

As wise economists have observed, although in most cases after the event, financial institutions should beware of putting toxic products on the market: the whole banking system is thereby put at risk of being poisoned. By 2008 it had become very sick indeed. Happily UK taxpayers (many of them toxic debtors) came

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll