header-logo header-logo

07 August 2008 / James Driscoll
Issue: 7333 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Whatever happened to commonhold?

Why has commonhold been so slow to catch on? James Driscoll investigates

It will soon be four years since commonhold became available for new property developments—commercial, residential or mixed use. Commonhold can also be used for a leasehold or a freehold conversion, provided that all the owners and others with interest in the premises unanimously agree. However, flat developments continue to be marketed and sold and managed on the traditional freehold/leasehold basis with all the potential legal and administrative difficulties that this can entail.

This system should be contrasted with commonhold which, since 27 September 2004, has been available for new development and for conversions. It confers freehold ownership for units within a commonhold coupled with membership of a commonhold association which owns and manages the common parts. A particularly attractive feature of commonhold, apart from conferring freehold ownership, is the fact that the documentation for a commonhold has been prescribed by a statutory instrument with allowance being made to include local rules suitable for the particular development. For example, each commonhold development must have a commonhold community statement (CCS) which specifies properties within

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll