header-logo header-logo

07 August 2008 / James Driscoll
Issue: 7333 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail

Whatever happened to commonhold?

Why has commonhold been so slow to catch on? James Driscoll investigates

It will soon be four years since commonhold became available for new property developments—commercial, residential or mixed use. Commonhold can also be used for a leasehold or a freehold conversion, provided that all the owners and others with interest in the premises unanimously agree. However, flat developments continue to be marketed and sold and managed on the traditional freehold/leasehold basis with all the potential legal and administrative difficulties that this can entail.

This system should be contrasted with commonhold which, since 27 September 2004, has been available for new development and for conversions. It confers freehold ownership for units within a commonhold coupled with membership of a commonhold association which owns and manages the common parts. A particularly attractive feature of commonhold, apart from conferring freehold ownership, is the fact that the documentation for a commonhold has been prescribed by a statutory instrument with allowance being made to include local rules suitable for the particular development. For example, each commonhold development must have a commonhold community statement (CCS) which specifies properties within

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll